Research on Optimal NIPT Timing Decision and Intelligent Fetal Abnormality Detection Based on Machine Learning and Optimization Algorithms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/h19n8p21Keywords:
NIPT, Non-linear Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine.Abstract
With the popularization of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) technology, determining a personalized optimal testing time for pregnant women with different characteristics. To address this issue, this paper proposes a comprehensive intelligent decision-making framework that integrates prediction, optimization, and classification. First, the framework constructs a quadratic multivariate nonlinear regression model to quantify the complex relationships between key factors such as maternal BMI and gestational age and the concentration of the Y chromosome in male fetuses. On this basis, it designs an optimal timing decision model aimed at minimizing potential risks for pregnant women, which is solved using the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, thus generating NIPT gestational age recommendations for groups of pregnant women in different BMI ranges. Finally, addressing the issue of detecting chromosomal aneuploidy in female fetuses, this study establishes and trains a support vector machine (SVM) binary classification model. Experimental results show that this framework can effectively formulate personalized testing plans, with the SVM classifier demonstrating superior discriminative ability on independent test sets, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.924, thus enabling efficient and precise identification of abnormal conditions. The findings of this study provide a scientific, data-driven theoretical basis and methodological support for NIPT clinical decision-making, showcasing the application value of integrating “prediction” with “decision-making.”
Downloads
References
[1] Jayashankar S S, Nasaruddin M L, Hassan M F, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): reliability, challenges, and future directions[J]. Diagnostics, 2023, 13(15): 2570.
[2] van Eekhout J C A, Bekker M N, Bax C J, et al. Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in twin pregnancies affected by early single fetal demise: A systematic review of NIPT and vanishing twins[J]. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2023, 43(7): 829-837.
[3] Liehr T. False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what can we learn from a meta-analyses on> 750,000 tests?[J]. Molecular Cytogenetics, 2022, 15(1): 36.
[4] Bedei I, Wolter A, Weber A, et al. Chances and challenges of new genetic screening technologies (NIPT) in prenatal medicine from a clinical perspective: a narrative review[J]. Genes, 2021, 12(4): 501.
[5] Mazarei A, Sousa R, Mendes-Moreira J, et al. Online boxplot derived outlier detection[J]. International journal of data science and analytics, 2025, 19(1): 83-97.
[6] Hu Y, Zhang L. Achieving long-term fairness in sequential decision making[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2022, 36(9): 9549-9557.
[7] Abualigah L. Particle Swarm Optimization: Advances, Applications, and Experimental Insights[J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 82(2).
[8] Salman H A, Kalakech A, Steiti A. Random forest algorithm overview[J]. Babylonian Journal of Machine Learning, 2024, 2024: 69-79.
[9] Kumari R, Nigam A, Pushkar S. An efficient combination of quadruple biomarkers in binary classification using ensemble machine learning technique for early onset of Alzheimer disease[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34(14): 11865-11884.
[10] Roy A, Chakraborty S. Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 233: 109126.
[11] Alsaqr A M. Remarks on the use of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients in assessing relationships in ophthalmic data[J]. African Vision and Eye Health, 2021, 80(1): 10.
[12] Muff S, Nilsen E B, O’Hara R B, et al. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence[J]. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2022, 37(3): 203-210.
[13] Pirsaheb M, Hadei M, Sharafi K. Human health risk assessment by Monte Carlo simulation method for heavy metals of commonly consumed cereals in Iran-Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2021, 96: 103697.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







