Pathway-Derived Features for Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Multidrug Resistance in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ftsj5s24Keywords:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR); Pseudomonas aeruginosa; KEGG pathway-based features; Machine learning, TabPFNAbstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a critical threat to healthcare, particularly due to surgical site infections. Current phenotypic testing methods are time-consuming, while existing antimicrobial resistance gene-based machine learning approaches suffer from limited data availability, poor multi-antibiotic prediction performance, and lack of interpretability. This study presents a novel framework using KEGG pathway-derived features to predict multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa. We annotated whole genome sequences to identify AMR-related metabolic and regulatory pathways, then evaluated these pathway-based features across multiple algorithms, including traditional machine learning methods like logistic regression, random forest, and KNN; deep learning models like MLP, CNN, LSTM, and GRU; and the tabular foundation model TabPFN. All algorithms achieved an accuracy above 0.85, demonstrating the robustness of using pathway-derived features for multi-drug AMR prediction. TabPFN showed superior performance with an accuracy of 0.926, successfully detecting resistance phenotypes across multiple antibiotics simultaneously while providing interpretable insights. In conclusion, the pathway-based features capture complex biological mechanisms underlying resistance beyond simple gene presence/absence, offering a meaningful framework for rapid resistance profiling. We hope this method enables accurate antibiotic selection in clinical settings, potentially reducing inappropriate antibiotic use and combating the spread of the AMR phenomenon.
Downloads
References
[1] Krell T, Matilla MA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Trends Microbiol 2024; 32:216–218
[2] Elfadadny A, Ragab R F, AlHarbi M, et al. antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: navigating clinical impacts, current resistance trends, and innovations in breaking therapies[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2024, 15: 1374466.
[3] Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 2022; 399:629–655
[4] Holmes AH, Moore LSP, Sundsfjord A, et al. Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. The Lancet 2016; 387:176–187
[5] de la Fuente-Nunez C. Antibiotic discovery with machine learning. Nat Biotechnol 2022; 40:833–834
[6] Harbottle H, Thakur S, Zhao S, et al. Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Anim Biotechnol 2006; 17:111–124
[7] Fluit AC, Visser MR, Schmitz F-J. Molecular Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:836–871
[8] Bilal H, Khan MN, Khan S, et al. The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predicting and combating antimicrobial resistance. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2025; 27:423–439
[9] Köser CU, Ellington MJ, Peacock SJ. Whole-genome sequencing to control antimicrobial resistance. Trends in Genetics 2014; 30:401–407
[10] Green AG, Yoon CH, Chen ML, et al. A convolutional neural network highlights mutations relevant to antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3817
[11] Zhao S, Tyson GH, Chen Y, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis Accurately Predicts Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes in Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:459–466
[12] Mahfouz N, Ferreira I, Beisken S, et al. Large-scale assessment of antimicrobial resistance marker databases for genetic phenotype prediction: a systematic review. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2020; 75:3099–3108
[13] Jia H, Li X, Zhuang Y, et al. Neural network-based predictions of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from whole genome sequencing and gene expression[J]. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2024, 68(12): e01446-24.
[14] Kim J I, Maguire F, Tsang K K, et al. Machine learning for antimicrobial resistance prediction: current practice, limitations, and clinical perspective[J]. Clinical microbiology reviews, 2022, 35(3): e00179-21.
[15] Wang S, Zhao C, Yin Y, et al. A practical approach for predicting antimicrobial phenotype resistance in Staphylococcus aureus through machine learning analysis of genome data[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 841289.
[16] Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069
[17] Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, et al. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:5825–5829
[18] Hollmann N, Müller S, Purucker L, et al. Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model. Nature 2025; 637:319–326
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







